Multilayered and digitally structured presentation formats of trustworthy recommendations: a combined survey and randomised trial

نویسندگان

  • Linn Brandt
  • Per Olav Vandvik
  • Pablo Alonso-Coello
  • Elie A Akl
  • Judith Thornton
  • David Rigau
  • Katie Adams
  • Paul O'Connor
  • Gordon Guyatt
  • Annette Kristiansen
چکیده

OBJECTIVES To investigate practicing physicians' preferences, perceived usefulness and understanding of a new multilayered guideline presentation format-compared to a standard format-as well as conceptual understanding of trustworthy guideline concepts. DESIGN Participants attended a standardised lecture in which they were presented with a clinical scenario and randomised to view a guideline recommendation in a multilayered format or standard format after which they answered multiple-choice questions using clickers. Both groups were also presented and asked about guideline concepts. SETTING Mandatory educational lectures in 7 non-academic and academic hospitals, and 2 settings involving primary care in Lebanon, Norway, Spain and the UK. PARTICIPANTS 181 practicing physicians in internal medicine (156) and general practice (25). INTERVENTIONS A new digitally structured, multilayered guideline presentation format and a standard narrative presentation format currently in widespread use. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Our primary outcome was preference for presentation format. Understanding, perceived usefulness and perception of absolute effects were secondary outcomes. RESULTS 72% (95% CI 65 to 79) of participants preferred the multilayered format and 16% (95% CI 10 to 22) preferred the standard format. A majority agreed that recommendations (multilayered 86% vs standard 91%, p value=0.31) and evidence summaries (79% vs 77%, p value=0.76) were useful in the context of the clinical scenario. 72% of participants randomised to the multilayered format vs 58% for standard formats reported correct understanding of the recommendations (p value=0.06). Most participants elected an appropriate clinical action after viewing the recommendations (98% vs 92%, p value=0.10). 82% of the participants considered absolute effect estimates in evidence summaries helpful or crucial. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians clearly preferred a novel multilayered presentation format to the standard format. Whether the preferred format improves decision-making and has an impact on patient important outcomes merits further investigation.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Using podcasts to support communication skills development: A case study for content format preferences among postgraduate research students

The need for the integration of generic skills training into structured PhD programmes is widely accepted. However, effective integration of such training requires flexible delivery mechanisms which facilitate self-paced and independent learning. A video recording was made of an eminent speaker delivering a 1-h live presentation to a group of 15 first-year science and engineering PhD research s...

متن کامل

بررسی دیدگاههای پزشکان عمومی در خصوص شیوه های اجرا وارزیابی برنامه های آموزش مداوم

Introduction : Because of the ultimate goal of continuous medical education is to improve outcome for patients by changing doctors practice behaviors, we evaluated the General Practitioners' view points on different methods for performing of CME programs ,different presentation formats and methods of evaluation of programs. Methods : A descriptive cross-sectional study was designed which was ca...

متن کامل

P-78: A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial to Determine the Effect of Iron Supplementation on Neonatal Outcome in Pregnant Women with Normal Heamoglobin (Hb=11-13

Background: To study the effect of iran supplementation on neonal outcom in pregnant women with normal heamoglobin (Hb=11g/dl )13 g/dl Methods : two handrad pregnant women with Hb=11-13 g/dl in the early slage of pregmancy? Materials and Methods: Each woman look one tablet of 50 mg of ferrossalphate daily in the case group (n=100) and placebo group (n=100). Results: While no significant differe...

متن کامل

Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

OBJECTIVE Summary of findings (SoF) tables present results of systematic reviews in a concise and explicit format. Adopted by many review groups including the Cochrane Collaboration and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), optimal understanding of SoF table may be influenced by the type of information being conveyed and objectives or preferences of the end user. This study aim...

متن کامل

Reporting of planned statistical methods in published surgical randomised trial protocols: a protocol for a methodological systematic review

INTRODUCTION Poor reporting can lead to inadequate presentation of data, confusion regarding research methodology used, selective reporting of results, and other misinformation regarding health research. One of the most recent attempts to improve quality of reporting comes from the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Group, which makes recommendations for...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017